[omniORB] Network performance

[Default User]

--- Brian Edginton <brian.edginton at gmail.com> wrote:

> I assume both cases (local and remote) were worse than omni but less
> delta
> between them?

Actually, no. The box-to-box tests had gSOAP beating omniorb. For the 
localhost test, omniorb was somewhere around 3 to 10 times faster. 
gSOAP being relatively unaffected (seemingly) by network latency, 
it was then around 3 times faster to on par, depending on the 
message type. The SOAP was notably slow with large arrays of doubles,
for instance, as we were using "document literal" mode.




Brian


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com