[omniORB] omniEvents 2.6.0 (All new stable release)

[Janet Tvedt]

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 12:56, Alex Tingle wrote:
> Janet,
> 
> Janet Tvedt <tvedt at noao.edu> wrote:
> > Wow - this is very good!  I think this is comparable to what I've seen
> > with omniNotify.  Do you think that typed event channels helped to
> > achieve this performance increase?   I'm wondering if one could expect
> > similar performance gains if omniNotify were revamped.
> 
> omniEvents does NOT implement typed event channels. (Actually the OMG's
> typed event service interface is a bit strange. I'm not sure who would
> use it.)
> 
> omniEvents is much simpler than omniNotify - the CosNotification spec is
> a superset of the CosEventService. omniEvents does not support any
> per-proxy behaviour - event messages are just a CORBA::Any which goes in
> one end and comes out the other.
> 
> -Alex

Sorry.  I guess I didn't understand this point from the original
message:

> >  o Event channels can be configured to only pass on events of a
> >    particular CORBA type. Combined with channel federation, this
> >    allows Consumers to choose which type of events to receive.

Janet