RES: [omniORB] omniidl bug in deep and complex namespaces

Juan Esteban Bernabo jbernab@OpenComm.com.br
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:24:31 -0300


Steve,

I see your point, but there is still a bug or some problem in the omniidl
c++ backend that generates code that doesn't compile well.

Until now nobody has replied to this message with a solution.

Anybody has a clue on this problem?

Thank's in advance,
Juan.


-----Mensagem original-----
De: Stephen Crawley [mailto:crawley@dstc.edu.au]
Enviada em: terca-feira, 24 de julho de 2001 10:21
Para: Juan Esteban Bernabo
Cc: Omniorb-List; crawley@dstc.edu.au
Assunto: Re: [omniORB] omniidl bug in deep and complex namespaces 



Juan,

I suspect that you are trying to map deeply nested java package names
directly onto IDL with deeply nested modules.  This is probably a bad
idea, and probably unnecessary.  People typically make this mistake 
because they think this the only way to get an IDL -> Java compiler
to replicate the Java package structure in the generated stubs.  In
fact, any decent IDL -> Java compiler will allow you to specify the
Java package into which the IDL stubs will slot.

-- Steve