[omniORB] Win32 Question

[ryan.tecco]

All right, here is a little snip of what I am doing. It is basically based
on the eg2_xxxx samples.

class MyObject : public virtual _sk_MY
{
public:
	MyObject();
	virtual ~MyObject();
	virtual	char* request();
};

BOOL CMyDlg::OnInitDialog()
{
 ...
 int argc = 0;
 CORBA::ORB_ptr orb = CORBA::ORB_init(argc, NULL, "omniORB2");
 CORBA::BOA_ptr boa = orb->BOA_init(argc, NULL, "omniORB2_BOA");
 my_impl = new MyObject;
 my_impl->_obj_is_ready(boa);
 MY_var objRef = my_impl->_this();
 CORBA::String_var temp = orb->object_to_string(objRef);
 std::ofstream outFile("iiop.txt", ios::out);
 outFile << (char *)temp;
 outFile.close();
 boa->impl_is_ready(0, 1); 
 ...
}

void CVoiceRecDlg::OnCancel() 
{
	delete my_impl;
	CDialog::OnCancel();
}
--------------
ryan.tecco
734.647.8057
microcosm/CAVE programmer
the university of michigan
"when all the pettiness is gone,
what do we really have?"

On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Bruce Visscher wrote:

> Ryan,
> 
> If I had to make a WAG, it would be that you failed to duplicate an object
> somewhere in the server.  If you could post a small example with
> implementation that exhibits the problem then maybe someone could help.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> "ryan.tecco" wrote:
> 
> > I am running WinNT 4.0 SP3 and MSVC++ 6.0. I am writing an MFC
> > application. One of the objects within the main dialog is a object that
> > inherits from the CORBA skeleton. My client is able to connect fine, run a
> > remote method fine, but right after it runs it once, the server throws a
> > variety of debug assertions located in "object.cc" and some other files. I
> > switched to the run-time libraries, but then I got a more serious error.
> > It just looks to me like I am not initializing or doing something properly
> > (being new to CORBA and all ;) Please let me know any suggestions if this
> > sounds at all familiar.
> >
> > rt
> >
> > --------------
> > ryan.tecco
> > 734.647.8057
> > microcosm/CAVE programmer
> > the university of michigan
> > "when all the pettiness is gone,
> > what do we really have?"
> 
>