[omniORB] performance comparison

Boris Khanales boris@imagine-sw.com
ri, 17 Apr 1998 13:25:22 -0400


--5d3c_ad8-24e6_2ed2-144e_3cfe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-MD5: 8Ij39vlRqrf4xCx7Keu8NA==
X-Sun-Data-Type: text

Did anybody try to compare whith ACE/TAO ???
Also I'd like to offer good idl for 
performance test.


> From owner-omniorb-list@orl.co.uk Fri Apr 17 12:41 EDT 1998
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:04:21 -0400
> To: omniorb-list@cam-orl.co.uk
> Subject: [omniORB] performance comparison
> From: Sai-Lai Lo <S.Lo@orl.co.uk>
> 
> Apparently, there is a throughput test published on this page comparing
> omniORB 2.5.0 with Visibroker 3.1 and Orbix 2.3c:
> 
>   http://www.kav.cas.cz/~buble/corba/graf/through.html
> 
> Nice to know we consistently come on top and beat the other two by a huge
> margin on type Any :-)
> 
> Sai-Lai
> 
> 
--5d3c_ad8-24e6_2ed2-144e_3cfe
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-MD5: QPQg6xCbk28w0M//lTNpcQ==
Content-Description: test.idl




struct MessageNode
{
    long id_;
    any          value_;
};


struct Message
{
    sequence<MessageNode>  data_;
    unsigned long   id_;
    long    msgType_;
};



interface Service
{
    unsigned long send( in Message msg );
    unsigned long sendStr( in string msg );
};


--5d3c_ad8-24e6_2ed2-144e_3cfe--