[omniORB] Re: [Pkg-corba-devel] Bug#626099: Please update to new upstream version 3.0

[Thomas Girard]

(adding omniorb support mailing list)

Hello,

your title is rather unclear: which version 3.0 are you referring to?

Le 08/05/2011 21:14, Kike a écrit :
> Package: omniorb-dfsg
> Version: 4.1.5-1 <http://packages.debian.org/source/stable/omniorb-dfsg>
> Severity: important
> 
> Hi,
> 
> latest omniorb version has some kind of problem prefering IPv6 over IPv4. Using netstat to look for this reveals differents behavior 
> 
> /omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 13:32:36.798617: Version: 4.1.5
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 13:32:36.798942: Distribution date: Wed Dec 22 15:59:17 GMT 2010 dgrisby
> SocketNetlink::SocketNetlink [BEGIN]
> SocketNetlink::SocketNetlink [END]
> GlkmNetlinkClient::GlkmNetlinkClient ERROR
> Protocol not supported
> LinuxKernelMonitor_i::CONSTRUCTOR [BEGIN]
> LinuxKernelMonitor_i::CONSTRUCTOR [ENG]
> IDL object LinuxKernelMonitor IOR = ' IOR:010000001b00000049444c3a4c696e75784b65726e656c4d6f6e69746f723a312e300000010000000000000064000000010102000d0000003139322e3136382e302e363000002bca0e000000fe54f3bb4d00000403000000000000000200000000000000080000000100000000545441010000001c00000001000000010001000100000001000105090101000100000009010100 '
> main::bindObjectToName [BEGIN]
> main::bindObjectToName Get reference to root context
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 13:32:36.882434: Invoke '_is_a' on remote: key<NameService>
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 13:32:36.884048: Unable to open new connection: giop:tcp:localhost:2809
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 13:32:36.884062: throw giopStream::CommFailure from giopStream.cc:1149(0,NO,TRANSIENT_ConnectFailed)
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 13:32:36.885286: throw TRANSIENT from omniObjRef.cc:809 (NO,TRANSIENT_ConnectFailed)
> Caught system exception TRANSIENT -- unable to contact the server.
> /
> Using stable version 4.1.3-1 with same program, there is no problem
> 
> /omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.347771: Version: 4.1.2 
                                                       ^
                                                       |
-- is this supposed to be 4.1.3? ----------------------+

> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.348095: Distribution date: Tue Sep 23 10:43:28 BST 2008 dgrisby
> SocketNetlink::SocketNetlink [BEGIN]
> SocketNetlink::SocketNetlink [END]
> GlkmNetlinkClient::GlkmNetlinkClient ERROR
> Protocol not supported
> LinuxKernelMonitor_i::CONSTRUCTOR [BEGIN]
> LinuxKernelMonitor_i::CONSTRUCTOR [ENG]
> IDL object LinuxKernelMonitor IOR = ' IOR:010000001b00000049444c3a4c696e75784b65726e656c4d6f6e69746f723a312e300000010000000000000064000000010102000d0000003139322e3136382e302e363000001d930e000000fe6a2abc4d0000078a000000000000000200000000000000080000000100000000545441010000001c00000001000000010001000100000001000105090101000100000009010100 '
> main::bindObjectToName [BEGIN]
> main::bindObjectToName Get reference to root context
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.358873: Invoke '_is_a' on remote: key<NameService>
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.366295: Return '_is_a' on remote: key<NameService>
> main::bindObjectToName Bind Context
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.366460: Invoke 'bind_new_context' on remote: key<NameService>
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.368843: Finish 'bind_new_context' (user exception)
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.369983: Invoke 'resolve' on remote: key<NameService>
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.370724: Return 'resolve' on remote: key<NameService>
> main::bindObjectToName Bind objref
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.371556: Invoke 'bind' on remote: root/<5fab8e4c0100041b/0>
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.372072: Finish 'bind' (user exception)
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.372702: Invoke 'rebind' on remote: root/<5fab8e4c0100041b/0>
> omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.372991: Return 'rebind' on remote: root/<5fab8e4c0100041b/0>
> main::bindObjectToName [END]/

I don't understand these traces, and you don't explain your
network/program setup.

The only changes on IPv6 according to upstream changelog originated in
4.1.1.

Running catior on IOR above does not reveal anything interesting. I
think you need to provide more information.

Regards,

Thomas