[omniORB] Re: Corba firewall traversal specification

Harri Pasanen harri.pasanen at trema.com
Thu Feb 2 10:08:28 GMT 2006


On Monday 30 January 2006 18:38, Jonathan Biggar wrote:
> Last I heard the Firewall Traversal spec failed to progress
> to a final standard at the OMG anyway.
>

I'm not too familiar with OMG standardization procedure, but 
why would it then apper in final adopted specifications: 
http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2004-03-01  ?
Or does it still need to progress from adopted specification 
to a final standard?

-Harri


Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee of this message please notify the sender by return and thereafter delete the message, and you may not use, copy, disclose or rely on the information contained in it. Internet e-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Trema does not accept liability. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments have been swept for viruses, Trema does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.  Statements in this message or attachments that do not relate to the business of Trema are neither given nor endorsed by the company or its directors. A list of Trema's directors is available on our web site: www.trema.com


More information about the omniORB-list mailing list