[omniORB] omniNames sufficient for persistent objects?

[Peter Fischer]

Hello,

I use omniNames and want to ensure that, if my server application crashes,  
it can be restarted without also having the clients which have object  
references to it also to be restarted.
Most of the time it seems to work already, but sometimes there is no  
answer of the newly started server to the clients but also no error  
messages, i.e. the CORBA connection seems to work.
Some time ago I read about a bug in omniNames getting confused/messed up  
when garbage is written into it?
So I have the fundamental question whether per default objects bound in  
the naming service omniNames are persistent already or I have to ensure  
that the POA is persistent additionally?
Also I wanted to ask whether ones could post me a code snippet how to deal  
with dangling bindings like mentioned at the end of chapter 18.11 in the  
book "Advanced CORBA Programming with C++", 4th printing?
And is it possible to restart the server automatically from CORBA and not  
by hand (using Implementation Repositories I heared)?

Thank you in advance for answering me,

many greetings,

Peter.