[omniORB] strange omniidl c++ result

[Rene Jager]

On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 12:48, HoopsBhoy67 at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 09/07/2004 22:29:38 GMT Daylight Time,
> renej_frog at users.sourceforge.net writes: 
>         "static" should be "inline" IMHO
> 
> Should it really?

using static functions declarations in a namespace in a header file
results in reimplementing in every compiled object this header is
included in; I don't think that that is the intention of those
functions; I think it should be inline'd. If you have a better
explaination, pro or contra, I would like to hear so

renej
--