[omniORB] Implementation Repository

[James Waller]

 > I'm happy to help with autoconf support

Thank you, much appreciated. I would say expect another tarball by the 
end of next week. This will have updated documentation, altered source 
file suffix (from .c++ to .cc), new directory structure and a shared 
version of the renamed libcommon.a library.

Cheers,
James

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> 
>> The sample config file would be placed at the top level. This is 
>> closer to the omniORB package's structure. What do you think?
> 
> 
> Duncan may have more suggestions (I've been making them as though I know 
> what I'm doing ;) but istm that all is good. I might suggest renaming 
> "common" to "lib" as is done in the omniORB distro.
> 
> I'm happy to help with autoconf support (I'll use it for RPM building 
> etc). And I'm looking forward to trying things out, which I haven't yet 
> done. Is a new tarball imminent, or do I have time to poke at what is 
> already here?
> 
>                      - Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> omniORB-list mailing list
> omniORB-list@omniorb-support.com
> http://www.omniorb-support.com/mailman/listinfo/omniorb-list
> 
>