[omniORB] (no subject)

[Olden A (SApS)]

The only reason for Using NamingContextExt is because the server is based on
an example, written about 2-3 months ago, so that's the only patiular reason
why the server was written like that to start with - ie., I didn't know how
to do it any other way (and to a crtain extent still don't)

I could rewrite I suppose, but the CORBA part of this is just a tiny part,
the major part is remote signal aquisation/analysis, so the server is
accesed by three or four mini-clients (which right now work fine), - and
when i tried using the  "Namingcontext" earlier, as opposed to the
"NamingContextExt", the code would find the NameService, but would not find
the Object "PH". Althougth to be fair I wasn't specifing a Context for that
object (because there isn't one in the server) - whenever I tried to call a
procedure from the Corba object on the server the client crashes syaing
Object cannot retirn NIL. - so i'm assuming that it can't be found.

Andrew


   

 

-----Original Message-----
From: bjorn rohde jensen
To: baileyk@schneider.com
Cc: Olden A (SApS); omniorb-list@omniorb-support.com
Sent: 06/01/03 18:56
Subject: Re: [omniORB] (no subject)

Hi Guys,

  Why use NamingContextExt instead of just NamingContext?
Using a corbaname or corbaloc instead of the
initialhost/initialport pair might also be a good idea.

Yours sincerely,

Bjorn