[omniORB] Help on OmniOrb4 and OmniEvents

Bjorn R. Jensen bjensen@fastmail.fm
Sat Sep 21 13:56:01 2002


Hi guys,

 Maybe it would be a good idea to settle with doing the
initial checkin on sourceforge and make the current
release available for download there. It would also be
very nice to make a package available for omniORB4. Updating
the source to use the BOA with omniORB4 is simple, but
switching from the old build system to the new is probably
beyond most but Duncan at the moment.
 Converting to use the POA is less of a priority, i would think,
since the BOA implementation is not to my knowledge broken.

Yours sincerely,

Bjorn

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:18:34 -0700 (PDT), "Paul Nader"
<pablo_nader@yahoo.com> said:
> Duncan,
> 
> Either way, but at this stage I'm not able to
> contribute any work as I'm in the middle of relocating
> from Australia to Spain - I haven't even got a
> computer to work on!
> 
> If anyone out there is itching to restart development
> of omniEvents I'm happy to give them admin access to
> the sourceForge project, etc... I'm also ok with
> merging it with the omniORB release.
> 
> I'm no longer subscribed to the omniORB list so if
> anyone wants to start porting it to the POA, etc and
> has any questions please feel free to reach me on my
> yahoo address.
> 
> Cheers, Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Duncan Grisby <duncan@grisby.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 September, bjorn rohde jensen wrote:
> > 
> > [ CCed to Paul Nader. Paul, people have been asking
> > about omniEvents
> > recently. Do you have any news? ]
> > 
> > >   The question is, what to do? Would it be
> > possible to
> > > merge omniEvents into omniORB eventually? Should
> > it be
> > > reinmplemented to use the POA instead of the BOA?
> > 
> > I last heard from Paul in June, when he was just
> > setting up a
> > SourceForge project. He said he was planning on
> > updating it to use the
> > POA. He also said he was busy with all sorts of
> > things, so I'm not
> > surprised we haven't heard anything since then.
> > 
> > I think it's probably best to keep omniEvents
> > separate from the
> > omniORB distribution, especially if Paul is still
> > interested in
> > developing it. I'm open to suggestions though -- if
> > people think it
> > would be best to incorporate it in the omniORB tree,
> > and Paul agrees,
> > I'm happy with that.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Duncan.
> > 
> > -- 
> >  -- Duncan Grisby         --
> >   -- duncan@grisby.org     --
> >    -- http://www.grisby.org --
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> omniORB-list mailing list
> omniORB-list@omniorb-support.com
> http://www.omniorb-support.com/mailman/listinfo/omniorb-list
>