[omniORB] packaging stubs in a dll

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:54:56PM +0100, Renzo Tomaselli wrote:
> Not so easy as far as data members are concerned (on gcc 2.96), such as
> typecodes and repoIDs. It seems that order of library feeding into the
> linker matters a lot, otherwise pointers across shlibs remain (silently)
> initialized to null, unlike on NT where they remain initialized to garbage.
> Same mud, different colors ...

I'm not sure if this is the cause of _your_ problem, but you might
want to consider upgrading your compiler to 2.95 (yes, 2.95 is newer).
2.96 never existed, is some Redhat release of a pre-release compiler,
and has caused various people lots of grief in sometimes strange ways.
Even if it's not your problem, you might want to consider upgrading
:-).

See: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html

-- Nathaniel

-- 
Sentience can be such a burden.

This email may be read aloud.