[omniORB] Echo *echoPtr vs. Echo_ptr echoPtr

[Stefan Seefeld]

Duncan Grisby wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 24 October, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> 
> > speaking of which, I'v always wondered why there isn't a similar technique
> > available for accessing repoIDs. Wouldn't it make sense to provide an
> > I::_repoID member ?
> 
> I would have thought so, but it's a C++ standard mapping issue.
> There's no use supporting it in omniORB (which already has a perfectly
> good non-portable member) if it's not part of the standard.

of course. I wasn't addressing omni's lack of that, but instead the missing
spec in the C++ mapping. Lots of template definitions, especially for resolving
objects, would be even easier, i.e. one less argument...

May be someone with some weight could issue that to the OMG...

Regards,	Stefan
_______________________________________________________              
              
Stefan Seefeld
Departement de Physique
Universite de Montreal
email: seefelds@magellan.umontreal.ca

_______________________________________________________

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...