[omniORB] interpreted clients (Python vs. Corbascript)

[Duncan Grisby]

On Tuesday 15 February, Tres Seaver wrote:

> Fnorb (and I think omniPy) uses DII/DSI within the stubs generated
> by the IDL compiler, and therefore has equivalent performance to a
> "pure" DII/DSI setup; the stubs are really "sugar."  I would tend to
> use the IDL if available, and to use CORBAScript's IR-driven
> approach chiefly as a "browser" for unknown services.

As I've just posted (at great length), omniORBpy actually uses an
omniORB specific interface from its stubs, so it's faster than
DII/DSI. Fnorb uses DII/DSI in its stubs, then implements DII/DSI in
Python!

Cheers,

Duncan.

-- 
 -- Duncan Grisby  \  Research Engineer  --
  -- AT&T Laboratories Cambridge          --
   -- http://www.uk.research.att.com/~dpg1 --