[omniORB] Naming Server

[Hai Wang]

Hi David,
	Thanks for your reply, I have compared "IOR"s by using both catior and 
stringified version. By using stringified version, the result is different as I 
guess. In catior case, the IP addresses for IORs are the same but the port 
number is different. Thats why the call to the function of object reference 
threw a COMM_Failure out. I really don't know where the problem could be.
	
Once again, thanks for your kind help!

Hai

> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:16:02 +0100 (GMT)
> From: David Riddoch <djr@uk.research.att.com>
> X-Sender: djr@pitanga
> To: Hai Wang <wangh@teltec.dcu.ie>
> cc: omniorb-list@uk.research.att.com
> Subject: Re: [omniORB] Naming Server
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> 
> On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Hai Wang wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi  all,
> > 	I have got a serious problem working with naming server. In 
> > server side, I tried to produce an object of my application and 
> > register it with a name in naming server, for the purpose of 
> > comparison I print out the "ior" of the object.
> > 	In client, I tried to get the object reference and print out its "ior", 
> > an exception of COMM_Failure is thrown when the client tried to run 
> > the function in the object reference. I compared the two "ior"s, they 
> > are different.
> 
> How did you compare the IORs?  Using catior, or by looking at the
> stringified versions?  The stringified versions may differ, but the output
> of catior is what matters.
> 
> David
>