[omniORB] IDL Question

[ryan.tecco]

My problem was that the exact situation was:

struct Finger
{
  //stuff
}

struct Hand
{
  Finger finger[5];
}

Which omniidl2 complains is a redefinition of the Finger type... I fixed
it.

Thanks!


--------------
ryan.tecco
734.647.8057
microcosm/CAVE programmer
the university of michigan
"when all the pettiness is gone,
what do we really have?"

On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Duncan Grisby wrote:

> On Sunday 6 June, "ryan.tecco" wrote:
> 
> > I have a situation like this: (in C++)
> > 
> > struct OneThing
> > {
> >   int counter;
> > }
> > 
> > struct SecondThing
> > {
> >   OneThing things[5];
> > }
> > 
> > How does this translate into IDL?
> 
> Exactly like that, except that int isn't an IDL type, and you need to
> end your struct definitions with semi-colons like:
> 
>  struct OneThing {
>    long counter;
>  };
> 
>  struct SecondThing {
>    OneThing things[5];
>  };
> 
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Duncan.
> 
> -- 
>  -- Duncan Grisby  \  Research Engineer  --
>   -- AT&T Laboratories Cambridge          --
>    -- http://www.uk.research.att.com/~dpg1 --
>