Java ORB to omniORB?

[Lars Immisch]

Jan Ulbrich wrote and I quote only one sentence:

> There is no defacto standard on how to name the COS services

This is not my understanding. I had this problem with JavaIDL and Eoin said =
in an email:

> The recent ORB Portability (POA) submission has mandated that all OMG IDLs
> should now have this prefix.

This submission can be found at: =
ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/interop/96-05-01.{pdf|ps}

So there is standard way to name the COS services.

Cheers,

Lars Immisch
--
lars@ibp.de